| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Introduce wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests |
| Date: | 2022-09-09 14:31:10 |
| Message-ID: | 115136.1662733870@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Pushed.
Recently a number of buildfarm animals have failed at the same
place in src/test/subscription/t/100_bugs.pl [1][2][3][4]:
# Failed test '2x3000 rows in t'
# at t/100_bugs.pl line 149.
# got: '9000'
# expected: '6000'
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 7.
[09:30:56] t/100_bugs.pl ......................
This was the last commit to touch that test script. I'm thinking
maybe it wasn't adjusted quite correctly? On the other hand, since
I can't find any similar failures before the last 48 hours, maybe
there is some other more-recent commit to blame. Anyway, something
is wrong there.
regards, tom lane
[1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=jacana&dt=2022-09-09%2012%3A03%3A46
[2] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=drongo&dt=2022-09-09%2011%3A16%3A36
[3] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=crake&dt=2022-09-09%2010%3A33%3A19
[4] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=peripatus&dt=2022-09-08%2010%3A56%3A59
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2022-09-09 14:36:45 | Re: Summary function for pg_buffercache |
| Previous Message | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2022-09-09 14:29:37 | RE: why can't a table be part of the same publication as its schema |