Re: fmgr changes not yet ported to AIX

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fmgr changes not yet ported to AIX
Date: 2000-07-11 16:13:57
Message-ID: 1151.963332037@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> writes:
> Just wanted to give a short message, that current snapshot does not
> compile on AIX due to the fmgr changes.

Without more details, that's completely unhelpful.

> What exactly does it gain except masking badly written code
> (casts to wrong datatype like ints to longs) that goof the optimizers and
> 64bit ports
> and solving the null value problem ?

> My ideas would be:
> - multi row returns
> - multi column returns (not opaque)

I've said before and I'll say it again: all I'm doing in this round is
fixing our portability and NULL-value problems. Better handling of sets
and tuples is a higher-level problem. If you want to start working on
that, be my guest...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karel Zak 2000-07-11 16:22:30 Re: Distribution making
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-07-11 16:03:57 Re: [HACKERS] Foreign key bugs (Re: "New" bug?? Serious - crashes backend.)