| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, April Lorenzen <outboundindex(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition |
| Date: | 2006-05-23 14:24:17 |
| Message-ID: | 1148394257.2646.811.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 09:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> writes:
> >>> We don't need a disinherit do we?
>
> > I propose: ALTER TABLE childN INHERITS ();
> > Thus I also think, that the list should be complete, and is not an
> > addition to existing inheritance.
>
> Don't like that at all: it seems far too error-prone.
What types of error do you think its prone to?
Can you say what you would prefer?
As ever, not that worried about syntax, but I would like to get
agreement on a specific way forward now we're discussing this.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Csaba Nagy | 2006-05-23 14:29:30 | Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition |
| Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2006-05-23 14:24:01 | Re: Performance Issues |