| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection? |
| Date: | 2006-05-19 12:26:33 |
| Message-ID: | 1148041593.2646.592.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 10:08 -0700, Jeff Frost wrote:
> May 18 08:00:18 discord postgres[20228]: [129-1] LOG: archived transaction log file "00000001000000000000007F"
> May 18 08:00:41 discord postgres[20573]: [254-1] LOG: archived transaction log file "00000001000000000000007F"
> May 18 08:00:41 discord postgres[20573]: [255-1] WARNING: could not rename file "pg_xlog/archive_status/00000001000000000000007F.ready" to
> May 18 08:00:41 discord postgres[20573]: [255-2] "pg_xlog/archive_status/00000001000000000000007F.done": No such file or directory
I'm not clear how you can have two processes both issuing this message,
since it is only the archiver process that ever says this.
Do you have two archivers running on this system?
pid = 20229 and pid = 20573
Presumably pg_xlog/archive_status/00000001000000000000007F.done already
exists?
Are there two postmasters running (at all)?
Is there somehow an archiver process running from a previously shutdown
postmaster (somehow)?
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Frost | 2006-05-19 15:23:11 | Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection? |
| Previous Message | Mario Splivalo | 2006-05-19 11:51:39 | Reclaiming used disk space |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-19 13:03:31 | Re: Compression and on-disk sorting |
| Previous Message | Luke Lonergan | 2006-05-19 11:59:14 | Re: Compression and on-disk sorting |