Re: Fix inconsistencies for v12

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix inconsistencies for v12
Date: 2019-06-03 17:26:54
Message-ID: 11466.1559582814@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> On 2019/05/30 18:51, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> I think it will be better to include postgres_fdw in the comment in
>> some way so that if someone wants a concrete example, there is
>> something to refer to.

> Maybe a good idea, but this will be the first time to mention postgres_fdw
> in the core source code. If you think that's OK, how about the attached?

This wording seems fine to me.

Now that we've beat that item into the ground ... there were a bunch of
other tweaks suggested in Alexander's initial email. Amit (K), were you
going to review/commit those?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Elvis Pranskevichus 2019-06-03 17:44:44 Re: WITH NOT MATERIALIZED and DML CTEs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-06-03 17:03:44 Re: WITH NOT MATERIALIZED and DML CTEs