Re: advice on PGSQL cluster (active/passive)

From: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: FM <dist-list(at)LEXUM(dot)UMontreal(dot)CA>
Cc: Mailing List Postgresql <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: advice on PGSQL cluster (active/passive)
Date: 2006-04-11 15:27:10
Message-ID: 1144769230.4096.8.camel@laptop.gunduz.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin


Hi,

On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 10:52 -0400, FM wrote:
> What do you mean by " You need to configure the cluster.conf so that
> it
> uses any fence device otherwise your nodes may fail randomly."
>
> FYI : I'll use my APC symetra as my fencing device

My experiences show that many people forget to configure the fence
device in their Cluster configurations. That's why I said so. (This is
offtopic for this list, but I wanted to write)

Regards,
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PL/php, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Hoover 2006-04-11 23:02:45 Autovacuum ideas
Previous Message FM 2006-04-11 14:52:56 Re: advice on PGSQL cluster (active/passive)