Re: PostgreSQL Top 10 Wishlist

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tony Caduto <tony(dot)caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Top 10 Wishlist
Date: 2006-01-19 06:57:47
Message-ID: 11439.1137653867@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tony Caduto <tony(dot)caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com> writes:
>> It would definately be nice if the end-user concept of column order
>> wasn't tied to the physical order in the database.

> Ok this may be over simplistic, but we have a attnum for the physical
> order, why not just add a attorder and then we could just change that
> numbering and order by that field instead of attnum?

Please go back and read the very extensive discussions of this question
a couple years ago in the pghackers archives (around the time we were
implementing DROP COLUMN, iirc). There is no "just" about it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2006-01-19 07:09:42 Re: No heap lookups on index
Previous Message Greg Stark 2006-01-19 06:56:51 Re: No heap lookups on index