| From: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rafael Martinez <r(dot)m(dot)guerrero(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no> |
| Cc: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Bloated pg_shdepend_depender_index |
| Date: | 2006-03-28 21:15:00 |
| Message-ID: | 1143580500.3625.92.camel@state.g2switchworks.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 13:51, Rafael Martinez wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 12:09 -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>
> >
> > Fortunately, you can use Slony to migrate between versions, greatly
> > reducing downtime.
>
> Yes, this is true, but the problem is that if the database is 'big' and
> running in an expensive system you need to double your investment only
> for the upgrade.
>
> I am sure we can find another way of doing this that is easier and
> faster.
Any large, production system should already have replication in place.
If not, you're taking your chances with that big system that make any
investment questionable. If downtime is a real problem.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Salem Berhanu | 2006-03-28 22:26:45 | postgres and persistant connections (using Apache::DBI) |
| Previous Message | Thomas F. O'Connell | 2006-03-28 20:31:30 | Remote On-line Backup |