Re: INS/UPD/DEL RETURNING for 8.2

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: INS/UPD/DEL RETURNING for 8.2
Date: 2006-03-02 23:45:38
Message-ID: 1141343138.24513.13.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 17:51 -0500, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> Patch for core and PL/pgSQL to support the INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE
> RETURNING syntax in 8.2

I wonder if we should try to consistently treat an INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE
with a RETURNING clause like a SELECT with an equivalent target list.
For example, should it be possible to write:

FOR x in DELETE FROM t1 WHERE ... RETURNING t1.x LOOP
...
END LOOP;

Or open a cursor for a data-modifying statement with a RETURNING clause,
etc.

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-03-03 00:07:23 Re: Fix overflow of bgwriter's request queue
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2006-03-02 22:51:20 INS/UPD/DEL RETURNING for 8.2