| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: INS/UPD/DEL Returning P.tch |
| Date: | 2006-03-02 22:33:34 |
| Message-ID: | 1141338814.24513.3.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 17:23 -0500, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> If this is the consensus, then I'm fine with posting to -patches
Yeah, -patches is the right place.
> I just want to make sure people are aware of it so it can get tested.
I wouldn't expect a whole lot of testing. The usual process is that the
person submitting the patch does all the coding and testing, then
submits it to -patches. When the patch is reviewed, you might need to
resubmit it a few times to satisfy the reviewers' comments. Then a
committer will apply the patch (often with some additional changes, at
least in my case).
-Neil
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig A. James | 2006-03-02 22:47:05 | Re: PG Extensions: Must be statically linked? |
| Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2006-03-02 22:23:03 | Re: INS/UPD/DEL Returning P.tch |