On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 14:27, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 14:18, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Stephan Szabo wrote:
> > > > > justify_days doesn't currently do anything with this result --- it
> > > > > thinks its charter is only to reduce day components that are >= 30 days.
> > > > > However, I think a good case could be made that it should normalize
> > > > > negative days too; that is, the invariant on its result should be
> > > > > 0 <= days < 30, not merely days < 30.
> > > >
> > > > What about cases like interval '1 month -99 days', should that turn into
> > > > interval '-3 mons +21 days' or '-2 mons -9 days'?
> > >
> > > I think it should be the later. It is best to have a single sign, and I
> > > think it is possible in all cases:
> > >
> > > '2 mons -1 days'
> > >
> > > could be adjusted to '1 mons 29 days'.
> >
> > There's a part of me that thinks the WHOLE THING should be positive or
> > negative:
> >
> > -(2 months 1 day)
>
> But it isn't '-2 months, -1 day'. I think what you are saying is what I
> am saying, that we should make the signs consistent.
Pretty much. It just seems wrong to have different signs in what is
essentially a single unit.
We don't say 42 degrees, -12 minutes when measuring arc, do we? Then
again, maybe some folks do. It just seems wrong to me.