Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: "Stefan Kaltenbrunner" <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL WWW" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry
Date: 2011-05-20 17:46:50
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
On Fri, May 20, 2011 1:38 pm, Dave Page wrote:

>> We need something. I need to be able to push buildfarm client tarballs
>> too, so Tom's not the only person who needs this.
> No, I don't expect he is. Like his work though, in my mind the
> buildfarm is a "family" project that we could accomodate in other
> ways.

Sure, I just wanted to make sure this is on the table up front.

>> Even more importantly, the mailings lists on pgfoundry are a critical
>> piece of the buildfarm infrastructure - that's how status notifications
>> get out to people like Tom. We also need lists for commit notifications
>> and members discussion.
> Any reason we couldn't use the main list server for that?

Would work for me.



In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2011-05-20 17:47:18
Subject: Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2011-05-20 17:38:20
Subject: Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group