Re: PROPOSAL of xmlvalidate

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomáš Pospíšil <killteck(at)seznam(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, chmelab(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL of xmlvalidate
Date: 2010-11-29 18:30:51
Message-ID: 1140.1291055451@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 11/29/2010 12:36 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> But that could equally well be stored in a user table rather than a
>> system table.

> Yeah. The trouble is you won't be able to use that reliably in a check
> constraint, which I imagine is one of the principal intended purposes.

Moving the same data to a system table doesn't fix that, unless you
require that the system table be immutable ... which'd seem to make
the idea useless.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-11-29 18:38:54 Re: compile error via SIOCGLIFCONF from ip.c on hpux-11
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2010-11-29 18:19:35 compile error via SIOCGLIFCONF from ip.c on hpux-11