Re: Bug Report

From: pedro farinha <pedro(at)geotaxi(dot)com>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: Ralph Moser <ralph(dot)twentyone(at)gmail(dot)com>, "jdbc(dot)postgres" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug Report
Date: 2006-02-07 02:52:50
Message-ID: 1139280770.2693.58.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Hi,
Ralph make sure there is no older JDBC jar on the Sun Server class path.
You maybe have a datasource/Data Server type defined referencing an
older jar? look at the SAS Admin for JNDI and Datasources you probably
will find something not 100% as you wanted there, or on Creator on Data
Server type form.
On Creator make sure you delete the Data base server type and recreate
using the newer jar, drop all of the defined datasources with the old DB
Server type, and remove them from the Project (right on the bottom ....
Data source references).
The most important thing though is to search for older versions of the
jar in the Sun Server / glassfish, and make sure you delete it, all of
them. ( if you use SAS8 or GlassFish they should be on <server>/lib)
Then recreate the Data sources and add them to the project, build and
deploy, this should add the required jar postgresql driver to the
classpath of the server. A bit overkill? yes I also think so, but worked
for me. I am 99.99% certain if you remove the old jar from the SAS
classpath and add the new one( or redefine the DataServerType), it
should do it. But hey, that was a transcript from my notes when I had to
doit! Most important for run-time, is to make sure the older jar is not
there, It is class-loading issue. The class loader will load the classes
once, if it picks the old one first.....

I have found several problems using Postgresql and CachedRowSet, still
not 100% if it is a driver problem or a Creator design problem, the bug
you refer it is , I think, a Creator design problem, as postgresql
adheres to the spec ( again on my view). One other issue, a bit more
problematic (if not yet solved) is the setTransactionLevel(), while
transaction in progress. I have overcome that, using a patch from (sorry
mate can't remember you're name) but it basically cancels the exception
( turning it into a System.out.println('oops'), causing the "obvious"
problems to go away. But there are others, I couldn't use CachedRowSet
to insert and delete, so I dropped the use of CachedRowSet. Which is OK
but not that OK! In the end of the day for real things you would need to
create a DTO, and well, in that case you might want to use a
Object*DataSource. And that model is really the correct approach, I
think. On other hand if the only thing you want is to display a
RecordSet in a table the new driver does the job.

Ok , a bit verbose sorry for that, in 1 line. Make sure no other jar but
the one you want to use are on <server>/lib ;)!


On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 17:59, Kris Jurka wrote:

> On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Ralph Moser wrote:
>
> > What i have meant is that in the Creator no error occours. With earlier
> > Versions of the driver the Creator reports also an error befor deploying the
> > app. (After draging a DB Table on a component) The 500DEV is the first
> > version wich alows me to drag a DB Table on a component. But if i deploy and
> > run the app I get the error i reportet before. I am 100% shure that i use
> > the correct driver at runtime. (Testet on an other PC with only the 500DEV
> > driver installed)
>
> Well, please send the complete stacktrace from this error and the
> datatypes of the table involved.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pedro farinha 2006-02-07 03:06:12 Re: Statement has been closed (only in Windows)
Previous Message Kris Jurka 2006-02-06 17:59:55 Re: Bug Report