| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, andrew5(at)ece(dot)cmu(dot)edu, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in |
| Date: | 2006-02-02 21:45:06 |
| Message-ID: | 1138916707.5342.41.camel@swithin |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-interfaces pgsql-patches |
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 16:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > As a matter of curiosity, why does ecpg handle dollar quoting like that?
> > psql, for example, happily just passes a dollar quoted string through to
> > the backend, without any need to convert it to a conventionally quoted
> > string.
>
> Doesn't ecpg have to convert string literals into C string constants?
>
I believe so. But doesn't it do that by surrounding them with double
quotes, and escaping embedded double quotes (and now newlines) ? The
backend still needs to see what it will accept as a quote delimiter,
surely.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2006-02-02 23:08:45 | Re: BUG #2231: Incorrect Order By |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-02 21:41:01 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-02-03 03:55:23 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in ecpg |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-02 21:41:01 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-02-02 22:13:24 | Re: Multiple logical databases |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-02 21:41:01 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in |