Home
About
Download
Documentation
Community
Developers
Support
Donate
Your account
Quick Links
Community
Contributors
Mailing Lists
IRC
Local User Groups
Events
International Sites
Re: Equivalent of a RECORD[] data type used in a function?
From:
nboutelier(at)hotmail(dot)com
To:
pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:
Re: Equivalent of a RECORD[] data type used in a function?
Date:
2006-02-02 19:06:45
Message-ID:
1138907205.297758.182490@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com
Views:
Raw Message
|
Whole Thread
|
Download mbox
|
Resend email
Thread:
2006-02-01 04:42:41 from nboutelier(at)hotmail(dot)com
2006-02-02 19:06:45 from nboutelier(at)hotmail(dot)com
Lists:
pgsql-general
Oracle keeps looking more and more appealing. $$$ vs actually being
able to get stuff done?
In response to
Equivalent of a RECORD[] data type used in a function?
at 2006-02-01 04:42:41 from nboutelier
Browse pgsql-general by date
From
Date
Subject
Next Message
Peter Eisentraut
2006-02-02 19:50:18
Re: Alternative to knoda, kexi and rekall?
Previous Message
nboutelier
2006-02-02 19:04:05
Re: Can't get the field = ANY(array) clause to work...