From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: COMMENT ON |
Date: | 2001-10-03 20:56:28 |
Message-ID: | 11384.1002142588@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> COMMENT ON AGGREGATE my_aggregate double precision IS 'Computes
> sample variance';
>
> works but looks strange syntax. Should we fix the program or docs?
>> I vote for fixing the program.
> If we fix this, we should also change DROP AGGREGATE, which also uses
> the paren-less syntax. (I think the COMMENT ON syntax was modeled on
> DROP.)
> I'd be in favor of changing, but we do need to maintain consistency.
> Another issue is that pg_dump knows about using both of these
> commands... we'll have a compatibility problem if we don't continue
> to accept the old syntax for awhile.
All fixed ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-10-03 22:05:07 | Re: CEST timezone |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-10-03 20:46:55 | Re: Unicode combining characters |