Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)

From: Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete Dutra <leandro(at)dutra(dot)fastmail(dot)fm>
To: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Date: 2006-01-19 08:23:16
Message-ID: 1137658996.12989.48.camel@bege.exemplo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Em Qui, 2006-01-19 às 09:54 +0900, Michael Glaesemann escreveu:
> On Jan 19, 2006, at 9:31 , Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete Dutra wrote:
>
> If these are things
> you're interested in (and it certainly appears you are), why not
> contribute?

'Cause unfortunately am not a hacker...

--
+55 (11) 5685 2219 xmpp:leandrod(at)jabber(dot)org
+55 (11) 9406 7191 Yahoo!: lgcdutra
+55 (11) 5686 9607 MSN: leandro(at)dutra(dot)fastmail(dot)fm
+55 (11) 4390 5383 ICQ/AIM: 61287803

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message kevin brintnall 2006-01-19 08:50:14 restrict column-level GRANTs to a single relation?
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-01-19 08:20:10 Re: Indexes vs. cache flushes