| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Contrib Schemas |
| Date: | 2006-01-13 19:26:25 |
| Message-ID: | 1137180385.3180.99.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 19:33 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> > What do you think?
>
> I think it's not broken and doesn't need fixing. I have not seen any
> groundswell of demand for moving the contrib stuff out of the public
> schema. On the other hand, doing so *will* break many if not all
> existing applications that use contrib modules.
This is the kind of thing that makes *me* break between releases. :-)
My memory is bad enough already... do we need this?
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-01-13 19:34:20 | Re: Contrib Schemas |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-01-13 19:18:29 | Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE |