Re: State of Beta 2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Network Administrator <netadmin(at)vcsn(dot)com>
Cc: kar(at)kakidata(dot)dk, PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: State of Beta 2
Date: 2003-09-14 16:10:58
Message-ID: 11353.1063555858@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Network Administrator <netadmin(at)vcsn(dot)com> writes:
> The abstraction I am talking about would be a logical layer that would handle
> disk I/O including the format of that data (lets call this the ADH).

This sounds good in the abstract, but I don't see how you would define
such a layer in a way that was both thin and able to cope with large
changes in representation. In a very real sense, "handle disk I/O
including the format of the data" describes the entire backend. To
create an abstraction layer that will actually give any traction for
maintenance, you'd have to find a way to slice it much more narrowly
than that.

Even if the approach can be made to work, defining such a layer and then
revising all the existing code to go through it would be a huge amount
of work.

Ultimately there's no substitute for hard work :-(

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Eckermann 2003-09-14 17:04:20 Re: Create index in PG table with vb6
Previous Message Martin Marques 2003-09-14 15:21:18 Re: need for in-place upgrades (was Re: State of