Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Single-Transaction Utility options

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Single-Transaction Utility options
Date: 2005-12-18 18:55:26
Message-ID: 1134932126.2964.187.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 20:03 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > Changes as discussed. "singletransaction.patch" attached.
> I meant to ask, why is this not the default or only behavior?  

Historically, it didn't work that way, so I hadn't thought to change
that behaviour. We could I suppose... but I'm happy with just an option
to do --single-transaction.

> Your 
> patch does not contain a documentation update, and so the user has no 
> information about why to use this option or not.

I was waiting for tech approval of the patch before writing the docs. A
doc patch is enclosed.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs

Attachment: 1doc.patch
Description: text/x-patch (1.9 KB)

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-12-18 19:04:53
Subject: Re: Single-Transaction Utility options
Previous:From: Volkan YAZICIDate: 2005-12-18 10:13:17
Subject: tuple count and v3 functions in psql for COPY

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group