Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, ntufar(at)gmail(dot)com, devrim(at)kivi(dot)com(dot)tr, mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Date: 2005-12-05 18:19:57
Message-ID: 1134.1133806797@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> With luck I can probably wrap this up today for the 8.1 stable branch -
> it would be nice if the new release actually did NLS right.

BTW, core has already agreed to postpone the releases a couple days
while we make sure we have this problem nailed down.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-12-05 18:31:20 Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-12-05 18:18:56 Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-12-05 18:31:20 Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-12-05 18:18:56 Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working