| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
| Cc: | Laszlo Hornyak <kocka(at)forgeahead(dot)hu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: elog in 7.4 |
| Date: | 2004-09-22 14:12:44 |
| Message-ID: | 11330.1095862364@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 03:02:22PM +0200, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
>> Tom, is there other way in pg 7.4 than backporting PG_TRY? It seems a lot
>> of work.
> IIRC PL/Python had a hack involving sigsetjmp (which was removed in
> favor of the cleaner PG_TRY). You could try doing that.
Indeed, PG_TRY is just formalizing something that was done already in a
few places.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-09-22 14:32:07 | Re: todo: comment field for pg users and groups |
| Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2004-09-22 14:11:36 | Re: todo: comment field for pg users and groups |