Re: Question on Insert / Update

From: Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>
To: "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres general mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question on Insert / Update
Date: 2005-11-09 15:36:21
Message-ID: 1131550580.8979.14.camel@coppola.muc.ecircle.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Quote from the link below:

"Tip: A block containing an EXCEPTION clause is significantly more
expensive to enter and exit than a block without one. Therefore, don't
use EXCEPTION without need."

I would think this places an automatic save-point at the begin of the
block. I doubt this would give the best performance for the given
problem...

Cheers,
Csaba.

On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 16:20, A. Kretschmer wrote:
> am 10.11.2005, um 1:45:46 +1100 mailte Alex folgendes:
> > Hi,
> > have just a general question...
> >
> > I have a table of 10M records, unique key on 5 fields.
> > I need to update/insert 200k records in one go.
> >
> > I could do a select to check for existence and then either insert or
> > update.
> > Or simply insert, check on the error code an update if required.
>
> Take a look at
> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/plpgsql-control-structures.html#PLPGSQL-ERROR-TRAPPING
>
>
>
> HTH, Andreas

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cristian Prieto 2005-11-09 15:42:36 Re: [HACKERS] Troubles with array_ref
Previous Message Ian Harding 2005-11-09 15:26:58 psql scripts