| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data |
| Date: | 2005-11-03 16:22:42 |
| Message-ID: | 1131034962.8300.1968.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 07:03 -0800, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> I don't believe the above is safe to say, yet. AFAICS, this has been
> discussed only on hackers (and patches) in this discussion, whereas this
> sort of change should probably be brought up on general as well to get a
> greater understanding of whether there are people who care. I expect that
> there won't be, but given that I'm still not sure what the plan to support
> applications upward is for this change, I think it's probably a good idea
> to query a larger segment of the population.
Fairly spoken, I believe.
I would suggest that I work just a little more with Tom et al to make
sure we have a plan that can fly. If so, I will query GENERAL as you
suggest.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-11-03 16:36:45 | Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-03 16:11:42 | Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-11-03 16:36:45 | Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-03 16:11:42 | Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags |