Re: SOLVED: insertion of bytea

From: Chris Mair <list(at)1006(dot)org>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SOLVED: insertion of bytea
Date: 2005-10-31 14:29:17
Message-ID: 1130768957.6383.37.camel@dell.1006.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


> I'm CPU-bound with an I/O well below what my disks could do :(
> [...]
>
> PS1: someone off-list suggested using oprofile, which I will do.

I've used oprofile and found out that with my test client (lots of
bytea inserts) the server burns a lot of CPU time in pglz_compress.

I'm using random data and my production data will be closed to random
(due to noise!), so compression is of course pointless.

By using
alter table dbtest alter img set storage external;
I can tell the server not to compress.

On a test box this brought net insert rate up by 50%,
which is enough to meet the requirements.

Thanks again :)

Bye, Chris.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kelly Burkhart 2005-10-31 17:12:05 8.x index insert performance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-31 14:24:10 Re: performance of implicit join vs. explicit conditions on inet queries?