Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch
Date: 2009-10-07 23:38:03
Message-ID: 11300.1254958683@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
>> We could possibly have VARIADIC throw an error if the
>> named argument that matches to the variadic parameter isn't the last
>> one, but I'm not sure that that's important rather than just pedantry.

> I would prefer such a restriction if it's reasonable to do.

[ pokes around ... ] It seems to only take a few more lines, so will
do.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2009-10-07 23:45:38 Re: COPY enhancements
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-10-07 23:15:59 Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch