Re: From oracle to postgresql...

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: From oracle to postgresql...
Date: 2005-10-20 18:55:28
Message-ID: 1129834529.23482.31.camel@jd.commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 12:35 -0400, Chris Browne wrote:
> dev(at)archonet(dot)com (Richard Huxton) writes:
> > If you have money to spend, it might be worth checking out
> > EnterpriseDB - they claim to have Oracle compatibility. News
> > item/company site below.
> > http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.367
> > http://www.enterprisedb.com/
>
> It would be quite useful to have some sort of general idea as to what
> the "closer compatibility to Oracle" of EnterpriseDB means.

Well that would be a question for EnterpriseDB and their marketing/tech
staff. There product is completely closed and there is no documentation
online.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dann Corbit 2005-10-20 18:57:33 Re: [HACKERS] 'a' == 'a '
Previous Message Andrus 2005-10-20 18:54:13 Re: Select all invalid e-mail addresses