Re: Documentation typos

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Documentation typos
Date: 2005-10-13 16:21:36
Message-ID: 1129220496.8718.99.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Thu, 2005-13-10 at 10:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Given that a substantial fraction of our community is accustomed to
> British spellings, I've never felt that it was appropriate to try to
> standardize either way.

The same reasoning applies to the audience of (and contributors to) most
publications. AFAIK it is not considered good style to mix spelling
variants freely -- we should pick one variant and use it consistently.

(If we're going to be really precise, we could also decide to follow a
set of conventions on punctuation, capitalization, and other minor style
issues, but I can't get too excited about it.)

-Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-10-13 17:04:28 Re: [HACKERS] Kerberos brokenness and oops question in 8.1beta2
Previous Message C Wegrzyn 2005-10-13 16:18:13 Re: BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR