| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Documentation typos |
| Date: | 2005-10-13 16:08:16 |
| Message-ID: | 1129219696.8718.87.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Thu, 2005-13-10 at 09:55 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> You seem to have lots of time on your hands if you can worry about this.
> How you spend it is your business, of course, but playing spelling cop
> doesn't seem worth it to me.
I think it's a perfectly valid thing to fix. Part of quality is getting
the details right, and following consistent conventions for spelling and
grammar in the documentation is part of that.
> Is there an official spelling standard for PostgreSQL?
No, although I think there ought to be one.
-Neil
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-10-13 16:17:40 | Re: Documentation typos |
| Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-10-13 15:49:20 | Re: BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR |