Re: comments on prepared transactions ...

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: comments on prepared transactions ...
Date: 2005-10-06 19:54:11
Message-ID: 1128628451.3738.49.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 19:13 +0200, Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
> i had to deal with oracle in the past couple of days (*mega sigh*)
> i have seen a very interesting feature which would make sense for
> PostgreSQL users.
>
> currently we have:
>
> test=# \h PREPARE TRANSACTION
> Command: PREPARE TRANSACTION
> Description: prepare the current transaction for two-phase commit
> Syntax:
> PREPARE TRANSACTION transaction_id
>
> in oracle it is possible to comment transactions:
>
> COMMIT COMMENT 'ORA-2PC-CRASH-TEST-n';
>
> if we added the possibility to comment prepared transactions it would be
> far easier for DBAs to find out what to do with prepared transactions
> once something has gone wrong (at least if an application adds some
> useful data to the comment). usually when the DBA has to fix something
> it has to be done FAST - some additional info would definitely help here ...
>
> what do people think about this?

I like it. It allows fairly easy definition of which exact transaction
you recover to when using PITR.

For 2PC, the difficulty might be to match up the name used on one
resource manager with that used on another. So we should look at how
other resource managers implement that so a match is more easily
possible.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2005-10-06 19:56:14 LDAP Authentication?
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2005-10-06 19:05:46 Re: prefix btree implementation