Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Performance considerations for very heavy INSERT

From: Ian Westmacott <ianw(at)intellivid(dot)com>
To: blblack(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance considerations for very heavy INSERT
Date: 2005-09-13 16:16:55
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:30, Brandon Black wrote:
> I started looking closer at my options for partitioning (inheritance,
> union all), and at Bizgres today.  Bizgres partitioning appears to be
> basically the same kind of inheritance partitioning one can do in
> mainline PostgreSQL.  Am I correct in thinking that the main
> difference is that they've coded support for
> "enable_constraint_exclusion=true" so that the query planner can be
> more effective at taking advantage of the partitioning when you've
> specified CHECK constraints on the child tables?  I may go for 8.1
> instead in that case, as the main win I'm looking for is that with
> inheritance I'll be doing inserts into smaller tables instead of ones
> that grow to unmanageable sizes (and that I can drop old child tables
> instead of delete/vacuum).

Perhaps I missed something in this thread, but don't forget
you still need vacuum to reclaim XIDs.


In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2005-09-13 17:22:43
Subject: Re: Performance considerations for very heavy INSERT
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-09-13 15:32:02
Subject: Re: Low performance on Windows problem

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group