Re: Call for objections: removing contrib/rserv for 8.0

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Call for objections: removing contrib/rserv for 8.0
Date: 2004-08-22 19:02:05
Message-ID: 11247.1093201325@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Although plans for a more general cleanup of contrib/ will have to go
>> back on the shelf for a future release, the core committee is still of
>> the opinion that it'd be wise to remove rserv in 8.0.

> Also we really should probably rip out Tsearch (not Tsearc2) as well.

Eventually yes, but I'm not too concerned about it misleading people,
since the competition (tsearch2) is right there beside it. The contrib
tree needs a thorough going over to eliminate deadwood, but during beta
is probably not the time to undertake that project.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Mascari 2004-08-22 19:35:47 Re: monetary bug
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-08-22 18:46:31 Re: Call for objections: removing contrib/rserv for 8.0