From: | Matt Miller <mattm(at)epx(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL: SELECT INTO EXACT |
Date: | 2005-08-15 14:03:38 |
Message-ID: | 1124114618.3361.7.camel@dbamm01-linux |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 21:53 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> This has been saved for the 8.2 release:
Just to clarify: the "SELECT INTO EXACT" patch was abandoned in favor of
the "#option select_into_1_row" patch. I submitted both patches as part
of the same -patches thread, but the latter solution, the "#option
select_into_1_row" patch, superseded the "SELECT INTO EXACT" idea.
The correct patch is at
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-08/msg00070.php This
should be the only patch that gets applied.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2005-08-15 14:19:31 | Re: obtaining row locking information |
Previous Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2005-08-15 14:02:10 | Re: GiST memory usage |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-08-15 23:04:35 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_file() and length/size |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-15 13:41:45 | Re: Command args user password |