From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: wal_buffer tests in |
Date: | 2005-07-27 22:00:55 |
Message-ID: | 1122501655.3670.204.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 13:30 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> I ran a wal_buffer test series. It appears that increasing the
> wal_buffers is indeed very important for OLTP applications, potentially
> resulting in as much as a 15% average increase in transaction processing.
> What's interesting is that this is not just true for 8.1, it's true for
> 8.0.3 as well.
The most important thing about these tests is that for the first time we
have eliminated much of the post checkpoint noise-and-delay.
Look at the response time charts between
http://khack.osdl.org/stp/302959/results/0/rt.html
and
http://khack.osdl.org/stp/302963/results/0/rt.html
This last set of results is a thing of beauty and I must congratulate
everybody involved for getting here after much effort.
The graphs are smooth, which shows a balanced machine. I'd like to
repeat test 302963 with full_page_writes=false, to see if those response
time spikes at checkpoint drop down to normal level.
I think these results are valid for large DW data loads also.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-07-27 22:01:21 | Some new list.c primitives |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-07-27 21:54:26 | Re: Integrated autovacuum |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matthew Schumacher | 2005-07-27 22:35:20 | Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 Bayes module. |
Previous Message | PFC | 2005-07-27 21:53:02 | Re: [Bizgres-general] Re: faster INSERT with possible |