Re: lots of updates on small table

From: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Alison Winters <alison(at)mirrabooka(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: lots of updates on small table
Date: 2005-07-14 16:37:42
Message-ID: 1121359062.780.31.camel@home
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 15:08 +1000, Alison Winters wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our application requires a number of processes to select and update rows
> from a very small (<10 rows) Postgres table on a regular and frequent
> basis. These processes often run for weeks at a time, but over the

Are these long running transactions or is the process issuing many short
transactions?

If your transaction lasts a week, then a daily vacuum isn't really doing
anything.

I presume you also run ANALYZE in some shape or form periodically?

> space of a few days we find that updates start getting painfully slow.
> We are running a full vacuum/analyze and reindex on the table every day,

If they're short transactions, run vacuum (not vacuum full) every 100 or
so updates. This might even be once a minute.

Analyze periodically as well.

--

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-07-14 18:26:52 Re: large table vs multiple smal tables
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-07-14 16:21:14 Re: lots of updates on small table