| From: | mudfoot(at)rawbw(dot)com |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: JFS fastest filesystem for PostgreSQL? |
| Date: | 2005-07-14 09:56:33 |
| Message-ID: | 1121334993.42d636d187a3b@webmail.rawbw.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Quoting "Jeffrey W. Baker" <jwbaker(at)acm(dot)org>:
>
> Here's the result, in transactions per second.
>
> ext3 jfs xfs
> ----------------------
-------
> 10 Clients 55 81 68
> 100 Clients 61 100 64
> ----------------------------
Was fsync true? And have you tried ext2? Legend has it that ext2 is the
fastest thing going for synchronous writes (besides O_DIRECT or raw) because
there's no journal.
>
> -jwb
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Stone | 2005-07-14 10:30:40 | Re: JFS fastest filesystem for PostgreSQL? |
| Previous Message | Dan Harris | 2005-07-14 08:05:23 | slow joining very large table to smaller ones |