Re: A Guide to Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning)

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Cc: bizgres-general(at)pgfoundry(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A Guide to Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning)
Date: 2005-07-13 15:10:29
Message-ID: 1121267429.3970.249.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 14:02 +0100, Richard Huxton wrote:
> Sounds very useful - even for my small systems. Does it/would it work on
> an ordinary table (for those cases currently using UNION ALL)?

I'm looking into that aspect right now.

I see no reason why it shouldn't work for UNION ALL views/queries in the
same manner as it does for inheritance.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-07-13 15:48:50 Re: [PATCHES] HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-07-13 15:05:00 Re: [PATCHES] HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default