Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] COPY view
Date: 2006-08-22 20:10:11
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> It sucks that patches are posted and no action is taken on them for
> months.  I agree with that.

This particular patch was originally posted during the 8.1 feature
freeze window (2005-09-29), so it was doomed to a certain amount of
languishing on the to-worry-about-later list in any case.  We should
have gotten around to reviewing it sooner than we did (the followup
discussion was around 2006-06-14), but there was still plenty of time
at that point to rework it per the discussion and get it into 8.2.

As I see it, we've effectively got a patch that was rejected once,
and Bruce wants to apply it anyway because no replacement has been

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-08-22 20:24:36
Subject: Re: BUG #2585: Please provide pkg-config support
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-08-22 20:01:07
Subject: Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: John GrayDate: 2006-08-22 20:24:32
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pgxml & xpath_table
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2006-08-22 19:36:30
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] COPY view

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group