Re: Concurrent psql patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Concurrent psql patch
Date: 2008-04-09 01:29:49
Message-ID: 11205.1207704589@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> This has been saved for the next commit-fest:
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold

Er, why "saved"? Until there's a new patch submission there's not going
to be more work to do on this in the next fest.

I think maybe you need to think a bit harder about the distinction
between your TODO-items-in-waiting list and the commit fest queue.
I was willing to wade through a pile of TODO-items-in-waiting this
time, because I pressed you to make the list available before having
sorted through it; but I'm not going to be pleased to see those same
threads in the fest queue next time, unless someone's done some actual
work in between.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-04-09 01:36:10 Re: Concurrent psql patch
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2008-04-09 01:28:03 Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-04-09 01:36:10 Re: Concurrent psql patch
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2008-04-09 01:28:03 Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a