Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths?

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths?
Date: 2005-06-07 18:18:56
Message-ID: 1118168337.26027.2585.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 13:49, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> >
> > Hrmmmm ... I can see the argument for ... and without knowing what the
> > conference area layout looks like, will the booths be at 'opposite ends'
> > of the conference floor? If they are just going to be next to each
> > other, then it seems redundant ... if you are looking at one at each
> > 'end' (I realize that there is not necessarily an "end" per se), then
> > two would make sense ...
>
> One will be in the .Org pavilion, one will be in the Commercial
> Pavilion. I don't know how close they will be but they will not be next
> to each other.
>

One issue that comes to mind is that we tend to make noise about being a
community organization rather than just a piece of a specific corporate
organization (like most of the other OS DB's)... would it not be odd if
we had *no* presence in the community Pavilion? Might it confuse people
who go looking in the community section for us and can't find any
presence for postgresql?

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-06-07 18:46:54 Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-06-07 18:16:21 Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths?