Re: Oracle date type compat. functions: next_day,

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, david(at)fetter(dot)org, kzak(at)redhat(dot)com, hsn(at)netmag(dot)cz
Subject: Re: Oracle date type compat. functions: next_day,
Date: 2005-06-03 00:12:34
Message-ID: 1117757554.22984.0.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 18:53 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I expect so less used functions will go to contrib: LNNVL, .. but some
> functions can by general usefull. There is WIDTH_BUCKET in core too now.
> Who use it?

width_bucket() is defined by SQL2003, and is included largely for
compliance with the spec.

-Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2005-06-03 00:37:39 Re: O_DIRECT for WAL writes
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-06-02 23:20:37 Re: [Plperlng-devel] Re: return_next for plperl (was Re: call