Re: postgresql-8.0.1 performance tuning

From: "Martin Fandel" <martin(dot)fandel(at)alphyra-evs(dot)de>
To: "Martin Fandel" <martin(dot)fandel(at)alphyra-evs(dot)de>
Cc: Postgresql Performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgresql-8.0.1 performance tuning
Date: 2005-06-02 13:10:03
Message-ID: 1117717803.4380.23.camel@fandelm.ecommit.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Ups,
i'm sorry. i've set the following values:

postgresql.conf:
shared_buffers = 70000
effective_cache_size = 1744762
work_mem = 32768
maintenance_work_mem = 262144
max_fsm_pages = 200000

sysctl.conf:
vm.swappiness=10
kernel.shmmax=715827882
kernel.shmall=2097152

Are the values ok for a 2 GB machine? I'm testing these settings
with contrib/pgbench. With this configuration i become up to 200tps
including connection establishing. Is that value ok for this hardware?:

1xP4 3Ghz (hyperthreading enabled)
2GB 266 Mhz RAM CL2.5

pg_xlog is on sda (raid1 with two 10k discs) and the database on
sdb(raid10 with four 10k discs).

My Linux distribution is Suse Linux 9.3 with postgresql 8.0.1.

best regards,
Martin

Am Donnerstag, den 02.06.2005, 14:50 +0200 schrieb Martin Fandel:
> Hi,
>
> hmmm i don't understand which are the best values for shmmax and shmall.
> I've googled around but every site says something different.
>
> I've 2GB of RAM now and set it to:
>
> kernel.shmmax=715827882
> kernel.shmall=2097152
>
> Is that value ok for 2GB of RAM?
>
> I've set the shared_buffers in my postgresql.conf to 87381
> (87381*8*1024 = ~715827882).
>
> Can I use www.powerpostgresql.com as reference to set this
> parameters? Or which site can i use?
>
> Best regards,
> Martin
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2005, 11:57 +0200 schrieb Steinar H. Gunderson:
> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 07:30:37AM +0200, Cosimo Streppone wrote:
> > >>fsync = true
> > > false
> >
> > Just setting fsync=false without considering the implications is a
> _bad_
> > idea...
> >
> > /* Steinar */
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2005, 11:57 +0200 schrieb Steinar H. Gunderson:
> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 07:30:37AM +0200, Cosimo Streppone wrote:
> > >>fsync = true
> > > false
> >
> > Just setting fsync=false without considering the implications is a _bad_
> > idea...
> >
> > /* Steinar */
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Fandel 2005-06-02 13:12:10 Re: postgresql-8.0.1 performance tuning
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2005-06-02 13:02:59 Re: BUG #1697: Select getting slower on continously updating data