From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: automatically generating node support functions |
Date: | 2022-07-11 15:37:39 |
Message-ID: | 1116889.1657553859@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On 11.07.22 01:09, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I was just rebasing meson ontop of this and was wondering whether the input
> filenames were in a particular order:
> First, things used by later files need to be found in earlier files. So
> that constrains the order a bit.
Yeah, the script needs to see supertype nodes before subtype nodes,
else it will not realize that the subtypes are nodes at all. However,
there is not very much cross-header-file subtyping. I experimented with
rearranging the input-file order, and found that the *only* thing that
breaks it is to put primnodes.h after pathnodes.h (which fails because
PlaceHolderVar is a subtype of Expr). You don't even need nodes.h to be
first, which astonished me initially, but then I realized that both
NodeTag and struct Node are special-cased in gen_node_support.pl,
so we know enough to get by even before reading nodes.h.
More generally, the main *nodes.h files themselves are arranged in
pipeline order, eg parsenodes.h #includes primnodes.h. So that seems
to be a pretty safe thing to rely on even if we grow more cross-header
subtyping cases later. But I'd vote for putting the incidental files
in alphabetical order.
> Second, the order of the files determines the ordering of the output.
> The current order of the files reflects approximately the order how the
> manual code was arranged. That could be changed. We could also just
> sort the node types in the script and dump out everything alphabetically.
+1 for sorting alphabetically. I experimented with that and it's a
really trivial change.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2022-07-11 15:41:14 | Re: [PATCH] Compression dictionaries for JSONB |
Previous Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2022-07-11 14:44:42 | Re: [PATCH] Compression dictionaries for JSONB |