| From: | Mischa Sandberg <mischa(dot)sandberg(at)telus(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove replicaiton FAQ item. |
| Date: | 2005-04-24 23:15:06 |
| Message-ID: | 1114384506.426c287a87058@webmail.telus.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-docs |
Quoting Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Jeff Davis wrote:
> > > Should the text include a mention of synchronous vs.
> asynchronous? Or
> > > does master-master imply synchronous?
> >
> > It shouldn't. It is possible to have synchronous replication
> without it
> > being master<->master.
>
> We could mention async vs sync but at the FAQ stage I think the
> multi-master/master-slave disinction is enough. Let's see what
> questions
> we get.
About all you can say is, it is not possible to implement synchronous
master-master replication, because of conflict resolution of
simultaneous transactions.
--
"Dreams come true, not free." -- S.Sondheim, ITW
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | User Andrewsn | 2005-04-24 23:18:08 | newsysviews - newsysview: fix for NOTHING rules and rules with multiple |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-24 22:54:29 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove replicaiton FAQ item. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-24 23:24:36 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove replicaiton FAQ item. |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-24 22:54:29 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove replicaiton FAQ item. |