Re: 8.2 open items list

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.2 open items list
Date: 2006-11-24 02:45:05
Message-ID: 1110.24.211.165.134.1164336305.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
>> > Also, we still need a resolution for contrib/adminpack placing objects
>> > into the pg_catalog schema:
>>
>> Well, there was a lot of difference of opinion on that, but I thought
>> the conclusion was to leave it as-is.
>
> Yes, that is my recollection too.
>

At the very least there is no consensus to do anything else.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-24 04:06:05 Re: Direct I/O issues
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-24 02:42:24 Re: 8.2 open items list