| From: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Filip Jirsák <Filip(dot)Jirsak(at)gymnacel(dot)cz> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 2147483642::abstime is null, 2147483644::abstime is |
| Date: | 2005-03-04 15:08:13 |
| Message-ID: | 1109948893.30529.417.camel@state.g2switchworks.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 08:25, Filip Jirsák wrote:
> Hi,
> why this statement:
> SELECT 2147483647::abstime, 2147483646::abstime, 2147483645::abstime,
> 2147483644::abstime, 2147483643::abstime, 2147483642::abstime,
> 2147483641::abstime, 2147483640::abstime, 2147483639::abstime;
>
> returns null form2147483646 and 2147483645? Is this feature or bug?
> (Server version is 7.4.5).
I'm running 7.4.7 on FC2, and i get this:
test=# SELECT 2147483647::abstime, 2147483646::abstime,
2147483645::abstime,
test-# 2147483644::abstime, 2147483643::abstime, 2147483642::abstime,
test-# 2147483641::abstime, 2147483640::abstime, 2147483639::abstime;
abstime | abstime | abstime | abstime
| abstime | abstime | abstime
| abstime | abstime
------------------------+---------+------------------------+----------+------------------------+------------------------+------------------------+------------------------+------------------------
2038-01-18 21:14:07-06 | invalid | 2038-01-18 21:14:05-06 | infinity |
2038-01-18 21:14:03-06 | 2038-01-18 21:14:02-06 | 2038-01-18 21:14:01-06
| 2038-01-18 21:14:00-06 | 2038-01-18 21:13:59-06
(1 row)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2005-03-04 15:11:59 | Re: status of inheritance |
| Previous Message | usya usya | 2005-03-04 14:43:37 | postgres service account |