Re: pgsql doesn't include replication...

From: "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>
To: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql doesn't include replication...
Date: 2005-02-11 23:54:57
Message-ID: 1108166097.19473.37.camel@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Awesome! This should be very well received. I can't wait to try it out
(and get away from my script for setting up slony) :)

Gavin

On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 23:10 +0000, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> ... is what we hear all the time.
>
> We *do* have enough replication solutions, but they're not immetiately
> visible and the argument "there are many different replication
> requirements, a single product will never satisfy that" stays true but
> those guys who want to see "replication included" won't understand that.
>
> As another step to make pgsql replication more visible, the next pgAdmin
> version will include Slony-I support, making maintainance a click thing.
> A preview image is at http://www.pgadmin.org//snapshots/pgadmin3-slony.png
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2005-02-12 00:05:26 Re: pgsql doesn't include replication...
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2005-02-11 23:10:10 pgsql doesn't include replication...