| From: | Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Multiline plpython procedure |
| Date: | 2005-01-21 09:13:42 |
| Message-ID: | 1106298822.8688.102.camel@sabrina.peacock.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 01:30 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> > Egads. So the set of valid Python programs is different depending on what
> > platform you're on? That's just, uhm, insane.
>
> No quibble here.
Funny discussion. Did you ever try a shell script written on
dos/windows, transferred binary to *nix, with for example bash?
Strange errors at the #! line? Yes. Here you are. You cant
blame python for it.
Python bytecode however is in fact running on every platform.
I think an approach where plpython compiles just like plpgsql
should be perfectly valid.
--
Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marco Colombo | 2005-01-21 11:02:09 | Re: Multiline plpython procedure |
| Previous Message | Stuart Bishop | 2005-01-21 07:39:06 | Re: Best Linux Distribution |