Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib?
Date: 2011-01-17 16:43:23
Message-ID: 11058.1295282603@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> Is there value in moving test_fsync to /contrib?

> Why would we want to do that?

So it would be built by default, installed under reasonable conditions,
and there would be a place to document it. Where it is, it's not a
user-facing thing at all.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-01-17 16:44:09 Re: Add support for logging the current role
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2011-01-17 16:40:31 Re: Spread checkpoint sync